The Context Problem
When we launched JIA (Jio's AI assistant) across 20M+ devices, we faced a critical challenge: How do you make an AI assistant truly helpful for complex, domain-specific queries without training a model from scratch?
The answer wasn't bigger models or more parameters. It was Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)—and it transformed our accuracy by +35% while keeping costs manageable.
What Is RAG and Why Does It Matter?
RAG combines the best of two worlds: the reasoning capabilities of large language models with the precision of information retrieval systems. Instead of relying solely on what an LLM learned during training, RAG:
- Retrieves relevant information from a knowledge base
- Augments the user's query with this context
- Generates responses based on both the query and retrieved information
Think of it as giving your AI assistant a constantly updated reference library instead of expecting it to memorize everything.
The Traditional Approach vs. RAG
❌ Traditional LLM Approach
- Knowledge cutoff dates
- Hallucination on specific facts
- No company-specific information
- Expensive fine-tuning for domain knowledge
- Static knowledge base
✅ RAG Approach
- Real-time information access
- Grounded, factual responses
- Company/domain-specific knowledge
- No expensive retraining needed
- Dynamic, updatable knowledge base
Implementing RAG at Scale: Lessons from JIA
At Jio Platforms, we implemented RAG across a 100GB+ corpus covering telecommunications, financial services, and digital products. Here's what we learned:
1. Chunking Strategy Is Everything
How you break down your documents determines the quality of your retrieval. We experimented with multiple approaches:
- Fixed-size chunks (512 tokens): Simple but often breaks context
- Semantic chunks: Better context preservation but computationally expensive
- Hierarchical chunks: Our winning approach—combining document structure with semantic boundaries
🛠️ Technical Deep Dive: Our Chunking Pipeline
1. Document parsing (preserve structure)
2. Semantic boundary detection
3. Chunk size optimization (256-512 tokens)
4. Overlap strategy (50 tokens)
5. Metadata enrichment (source, section, timestamp)
6. Vector embedding generation (Gemini embeddings)
7. Index storage (Pinecone/Weaviate)
2. Embedding Quality > Model Size
We tested various embedding models and found that domain-specific fine-tuning of smaller models often outperformed larger general-purpose embeddings:
- Gemini Embeddings: Our primary choice for general queries
- Fine-tuned BERT: For domain-specific telecommunications queries
- Multilingual embeddings: Essential for India's diverse language landscape
3. The Retrieval-Generation Balance
Finding the right balance between retrieved context and generated content was crucial:
- Too little context: Incomplete or vague answers
- Too much context: Information overload and higher latency
- Sweet spot: 3-5 relevant chunks with confidence scoring
RAG Architecture Patterns
1. Simple RAG (Good for MVP)
Query → Retrieve → Generate
Pros: Simple to implement, fast
Cons: Limited query understanding, single-hop retrieval
2. Advanced RAG (Our Production Setup)
Query Enhancement → Multi-step Retrieval → Reranking → Generation
- Query enhancement: Expand user queries with context
- Multi-step retrieval: Iterative information gathering
- Reranking: LLM-based relevance scoring
- Generation: Context-aware response generation
3. Agentic RAG (Future Direction)
Agent Planning → Tool Selection → Multi-source Retrieval → Synthesis
This is where we're heading with JIA's next iteration—autonomous information gathering and synthesis.
⚡ Performance Impact: Real Numbers
Before RAG:
- Accuracy: 62%
- Hallucination rate: 23%
- User satisfaction: 3.2/5
- Query resolution: 48%
After RAG:
- Accuracy: 84% (+35%)
- Hallucination rate: 8% (-65%)
- User satisfaction: 4.1/5
- Query resolution: 72% (+50%)
Common RAG Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
1. The "Garbage In, Garbage Out" Problem
Issue: Poor document quality leads to poor retrieval
Solution: Implement rigorous data curation and quality scoring
2. Context Window Overload
Issue: Too much retrieved context confuses the model
Solution: Implement relevance scoring and context summarization
3. Retrieval Bias
Issue: System favors certain types of documents or sources
Solution: Diversify retrieval with multiple ranking signals
4. Latency Creep
Issue: Complex RAG pipelines become too slow for real-time use
Solution: Implement caching, async processing, and smart prefetching
Building RAG for Production: Technical Considerations
Infrastructure Requirements
- Vector Database: Pinecone, Weaviate, or Qdrant for embedding storage
- Compute Resources: GPU clusters for embedding generation
- Caching Layer: Redis for frequently accessed embeddings
- Monitoring: Custom metrics for retrieval quality and latency
Cost Optimization Strategies
- Embedding caching: Avoid recomputing similar queries
- Tiered storage: Frequently accessed data in fast storage
- Batch processing: Efficient embedding generation
- Smart indexing: Optimize vector database performance
The Future of RAG
Emerging Trends
- Multimodal RAG: Combining text, images, and other data types
- Real-time RAG: Live data integration and streaming updates
- Federated RAG: Retrieving from multiple, distributed knowledge bases
- Self-improving RAG: Systems that learn from user feedback
Integration with Other AI Capabilities
RAG is becoming a foundational component in larger AI systems:
- RAG + Function Calling: Combining retrieval with action execution
- RAG + Code Generation: Context-aware programming assistance
- RAG + Multimodal: Visual question answering with knowledge bases
🚀 Key Takeaways for Product Managers
- Start with simple RAG: Prove value before adding complexity
- Invest in data quality: Your knowledge base is your competitive advantage
- Measure everything: Track retrieval quality, not just generation quality
- Plan for scale: Design your architecture for 10x growth
- User feedback is gold: Use it to improve both retrieval and generation
Getting Started with RAG
If you're considering implementing RAG in your product, here's a practical roadmap:
Phase 1: MVP (4-6 weeks)
- Simple document ingestion pipeline
- Basic chunking and embedding
- Vector database setup
- Simple retrieval + generation flow
Phase 2: Production (8-12 weeks)
- Advanced chunking strategies
- Reranking and relevance scoring
- Performance optimization
- Quality metrics and monitoring
Phase 3: Advanced (12+ weeks)
- Multi-step retrieval
- Dynamic knowledge base updates
- Personalization and user context
- Integration with broader AI capabilities
Conclusion
RAG represents a fundamental shift in how we build AI products. Instead of relying on increasingly large models to memorize everything, we're creating systems that can dynamically access and reason over vast knowledge bases.
At Jio Platforms, RAG transformed JIA from a generic assistant to a knowledgeable expert across telecommunications, finance, and digital services. The 35% accuracy improvement wasn't just a number—it translated to better user experiences, reduced support costs, and increased trust in AI capabilities.
As AI products become more sophisticated, RAG will be the bridge between general intelligence and domain expertise. The companies that master RAG today will build the most valuable AI products of tomorrow.
What's your experience with RAG implementation? Share your challenges and successes—I'd love to learn from your journey.