← Back to Blog
Product August 5, 2025 • 6 min read

The RAG Revolution: Why Context Matters More Than Model Size

Building better AI products through retrieval-augmented generation. Real-world insights from implementing RAG at scale with 100GB+ corpus at Jio Platforms.

RAG AI Architecture Product Strategy

The Context Problem

When we launched JIA (Jio's AI assistant) across 20M+ devices, we faced a critical challenge: How do you make an AI assistant truly helpful for complex, domain-specific queries without training a model from scratch?

The answer wasn't bigger models or more parameters. It was Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)—and it transformed our accuracy by +35% while keeping costs manageable.

What Is RAG and Why Does It Matter?

RAG combines the best of two worlds: the reasoning capabilities of large language models with the precision of information retrieval systems. Instead of relying solely on what an LLM learned during training, RAG:

  1. Retrieves relevant information from a knowledge base
  2. Augments the user's query with this context
  3. Generates responses based on both the query and retrieved information

Think of it as giving your AI assistant a constantly updated reference library instead of expecting it to memorize everything.

The Traditional Approach vs. RAG

❌ Traditional LLM Approach

  • Knowledge cutoff dates
  • Hallucination on specific facts
  • No company-specific information
  • Expensive fine-tuning for domain knowledge
  • Static knowledge base

✅ RAG Approach

  • Real-time information access
  • Grounded, factual responses
  • Company/domain-specific knowledge
  • No expensive retraining needed
  • Dynamic, updatable knowledge base

Implementing RAG at Scale: Lessons from JIA

At Jio Platforms, we implemented RAG across a 100GB+ corpus covering telecommunications, financial services, and digital products. Here's what we learned:

1. Chunking Strategy Is Everything

How you break down your documents determines the quality of your retrieval. We experimented with multiple approaches:

🛠️ Technical Deep Dive: Our Chunking Pipeline

1. Document parsing (preserve structure)
2. Semantic boundary detection
3. Chunk size optimization (256-512 tokens)
4. Overlap strategy (50 tokens)
5. Metadata enrichment (source, section, timestamp)
6. Vector embedding generation (Gemini embeddings)
7. Index storage (Pinecone/Weaviate)

2. Embedding Quality > Model Size

We tested various embedding models and found that domain-specific fine-tuning of smaller models often outperformed larger general-purpose embeddings:

3. The Retrieval-Generation Balance

Finding the right balance between retrieved context and generated content was crucial:

RAG Architecture Patterns

1. Simple RAG (Good for MVP)

Query → Retrieve → Generate

Pros: Simple to implement, fast

Cons: Limited query understanding, single-hop retrieval

2. Advanced RAG (Our Production Setup)

Query Enhancement → Multi-step Retrieval → Reranking → Generation

3. Agentic RAG (Future Direction)

Agent Planning → Tool Selection → Multi-source Retrieval → Synthesis

This is where we're heading with JIA's next iteration—autonomous information gathering and synthesis.

⚡ Performance Impact: Real Numbers

Before RAG:
  • Accuracy: 62%
  • Hallucination rate: 23%
  • User satisfaction: 3.2/5
  • Query resolution: 48%
After RAG:
  • Accuracy: 84% (+35%)
  • Hallucination rate: 8% (-65%)
  • User satisfaction: 4.1/5
  • Query resolution: 72% (+50%)

Common RAG Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

1. The "Garbage In, Garbage Out" Problem

Issue: Poor document quality leads to poor retrieval

Solution: Implement rigorous data curation and quality scoring

2. Context Window Overload

Issue: Too much retrieved context confuses the model

Solution: Implement relevance scoring and context summarization

3. Retrieval Bias

Issue: System favors certain types of documents or sources

Solution: Diversify retrieval with multiple ranking signals

4. Latency Creep

Issue: Complex RAG pipelines become too slow for real-time use

Solution: Implement caching, async processing, and smart prefetching

Building RAG for Production: Technical Considerations

Infrastructure Requirements

Cost Optimization Strategies

The Future of RAG

Emerging Trends

Integration with Other AI Capabilities

RAG is becoming a foundational component in larger AI systems:

🚀 Key Takeaways for Product Managers

  • Start with simple RAG: Prove value before adding complexity
  • Invest in data quality: Your knowledge base is your competitive advantage
  • Measure everything: Track retrieval quality, not just generation quality
  • Plan for scale: Design your architecture for 10x growth
  • User feedback is gold: Use it to improve both retrieval and generation

Getting Started with RAG

If you're considering implementing RAG in your product, here's a practical roadmap:

Phase 1: MVP (4-6 weeks)

Phase 2: Production (8-12 weeks)

Phase 3: Advanced (12+ weeks)

Conclusion

RAG represents a fundamental shift in how we build AI products. Instead of relying on increasingly large models to memorize everything, we're creating systems that can dynamically access and reason over vast knowledge bases.

At Jio Platforms, RAG transformed JIA from a generic assistant to a knowledgeable expert across telecommunications, finance, and digital services. The 35% accuracy improvement wasn't just a number—it translated to better user experiences, reduced support costs, and increased trust in AI capabilities.

As AI products become more sophisticated, RAG will be the bridge between general intelligence and domain expertise. The companies that master RAG today will build the most valuable AI products of tomorrow.

What's your experience with RAG implementation? Share your challenges and successes—I'd love to learn from your journey.

Srija Harshika

Srija Harshika

Senior Product Manager at Jio Platforms (AI Division). Led RAG implementation across 100GB+ corpus, improving accuracy by 35%. Expertise in scaling AI products across 20M+ devices.

More Insights